Forum Search:
Forum.Brain-Cluster.com: Brain Cluster Technical Forum
Ultimate forum for Technical Discussions

Home » Microsoft » Windows Server » Active Directory » Windows 2008 R2 and SMB
Windows 2008 R2 and SMB [message #161506] Tue, 29 September 2009 11:56 Go to next message
2010  is currently offline 2010
Messages: 36
Registered: September 2009
Member
I understand Windows 2008 uses a newer version of SMB, SMB 2.0. We are
using a multifunction scanner that sends scanned files to our Windows 2003
file server using SMB 1.0. Will this be a problem now because we are
introducing a Windows 2008 R2 DC or is the SMB a function of the actual file
server itself(which remains Windows 2003)?
Re: Windows 2008 R2 and SMB [message #161513 is a reply to message #161506] Tue, 29 September 2009 13:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
meiweb  is currently offline meiweb  Germany
Messages: 2225
Registered: September 2009
Senior Member
Hello 2010,

SMB 2 will only be used if NO lower OS version is used as connection partner,
otherwise SMB 1 is automatically choosen.

See "Server Message Block 2.0" in:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


> I understand Windows 2008 uses a newer version of SMB, SMB 2.0. We
> are using a multifunction scanner that sends scanned files to our
> Windows 2003 file server using SMB 1.0. Will this be a problem now
> because we are introducing a Windows 2008 R2 DC or is the SMB a
> function of the actual file server itself(which remains Windows 2003)?
>
Re: Windows 2008 R2 and SMB [message #161520 is a reply to message #161513] Tue, 29 September 2009 14:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
2010  is currently offline 2010
Messages: 36
Registered: September 2009
Member
How about my question regarding the smb being a function of the windows 2003
file server or the windows 2008 r2 domain controller that is authenticated
against?

"Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:

> Hello 2010,
>
> SMB 2 will only be used if NO lower OS version is used as connection partner,
> otherwise SMB 1 is automatically choosen.
>
> See "Server Message Block 2.0" in:
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
>
> > I understand Windows 2008 uses a newer version of SMB, SMB 2.0. We
> > are using a multifunction scanner that sends scanned files to our
> > Windows 2003 file server using SMB 1.0. Will this be a problem now
> > because we are introducing a Windows 2008 R2 DC or is the SMB a
> > function of the actual file server itself(which remains Windows 2003)?
> >
>
>
>
Re: Windows 2008 R2 and SMB [message #161521 is a reply to message #161520] Tue, 29 September 2009 15:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
meiweb  is currently offline meiweb  Germany
Messages: 2225
Registered: September 2009
Senior Member
Hello 2010,

SMB 1 or 2 is used between the different OS versions according to the list
in the article. It doesn't rely on DCs version. The version of SMB that is
used for file sharing operations is determined during the SMB session negotiation.

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


> How about my question regarding the smb being a function of the
> windows 2003 file server or the windows 2008 r2 domain controller that
> is authenticated against?
>
> "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:
>
>> Hello 2010,
>>
>> SMB 2 will only be used if NO lower OS version is used as connection
>> partner, otherwise SMB 1 is automatically choosen.
>>
>> See "Server Message Block 2.0" in:
>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx
>> Best regards
>>
>> Meinolf Weber
>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
>> confers
>> no rights.
>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>>> I understand Windows 2008 uses a newer version of SMB, SMB 2.0. We
>>> are using a multifunction scanner that sends scanned files to our
>>> Windows 2003 file server using SMB 1.0. Will this be a problem now
>>> because we are introducing a Windows 2008 R2 DC or is the SMB a
>>> function of the actual file server itself(which remains Windows
>>> 2003)?
>>>
Re: Windows 2008 R2 and SMB [message #161538 is a reply to message #161520] Wed, 30 September 2009 06:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
pbbergs  is currently offline pbbergs  United States
Messages: 1024
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Using smb has no relationship with authentication or authorization.

--
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci
2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
Microsoft's Thrive IT Pro of the Month - June 2009

http://www.pbbergs.com

Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup This
posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"2010" <2010@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1DA0DDC5-666C-43B4-B210-E3A5607A0C94@microsoft.com...
> How about my question regarding the smb being a function of the windows
> 2003
> file server or the windows 2008 r2 domain controller that is authenticated
> against?
>
> "Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:
>
>> Hello 2010,
>>
>> SMB 2 will only be used if NO lower OS version is used as connection
>> partner,
>> otherwise SMB 1 is automatically choosen.
>>
>> See "Server Message Block 2.0" in:
>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Meinolf Weber
>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
>> confers
>> no rights.
>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>>
>>
>> > I understand Windows 2008 uses a newer version of SMB, SMB 2.0. We
>> > are using a multifunction scanner that sends scanned files to our
>> > Windows 2003 file server using SMB 1.0. Will this be a problem now
>> > because we are introducing a Windows 2008 R2 DC or is the SMB a
>> > function of the actual file server itself(which remains Windows 2003)?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
SMB 2 for Scaner Net [message #334920 is a reply to message #161506] Thu, 03 December 2009 23:30 Go to previous message
Alex N  is currently offline Alex N  United States
Messages: 1
Registered: December 2009
Junior Member
We had a same problem the scanner did not work when have put win2008 r2, It has dared replacement of port (139) on which worked earlier on 445



2010 wrote:

Windows 2008 R2 and SMB
29-Sep-09

I understand Windows 2008 uses a newer version of SMB, SMB 2.0. We are
using a multifunction scanner that sends scanned files to our Windows 2003
file server using SMB 1.0. Will this be a problem now because we are
introducing a Windows 2008 R2 DC or is the SMB a function of the actual file
server itself(which remains Windows 2003)?

Previous Posts In This Thread:

On Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:56 PM
2010 wrote:

Windows 2008 R2 and SMB
I understand Windows 2008 uses a newer version of SMB, SMB 2.0. We are
using a multifunction scanner that sends scanned files to our Windows 2003
file server using SMB 1.0. Will this be a problem now because we are
introducing a Windows 2008 R2 DC or is the SMB a function of the actual file
server itself(which remains Windows 2003)?

On Tuesday, September 29, 2009 4:55 PM
2010 wrote:

How about my question regarding the smb being a function of the windows 2003
How about my question regarding the smb being a function of the windows 2003
file server or the windows 2008 r2 domain controller that is authenticated
against?

"Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS]" wrote:

On Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:27 AM
Paul Bergson [MVP-DS] wrote:

Using smb has no relationship with authentication or authorization.
Using smb has no relationship with authentication or authorization.

--
Paul Bergson
MVP - Directory Services
MCTS, MCT, MCSE, MCSA, Security+, BS CSci
2008, 2003, 2000 (Early Achiever), NT4
Microsoft's Thrive IT Pro of the Month - June 2009

http://www.pbbergs.com

Please no e-mails, any questions should be posted in the NewsGroup This
posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

On Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:42 AM
Meinolf Weber [MVP-DS] wrote:

Hello 2010,SMB 2 will only be used if NO lower OS version is used as
Hello 2010,

SMB 2 will only be used if NO lower OS version is used as connection partner,
otherwise SMB 1 is automatically choosen.

See "Server Message Block 2.0" in:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice
Working with Client Side Xml Data Islands from Server-Side ASP.NET code
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials/aspnet/23406c33-76e4-4b de-b8a9-e41f967e573b/working-with-client-side.aspx
Previous Topic:Domain and forest functional level RODC
Next Topic:Intermittent access delnied getting to Home Drive
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jan 16 10:42:31 MST 2018

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03463 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::Sitemap::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.0RC2.
Copyright ©2001-2009 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software